91Èȱ¬

°Õ³ó±ðÌý2016 accountability ratings and reports are available at the links below. Click a link to access accountability summaries, which show accountability ratings and distinction designations, and tables showing the data used to assign the ratings and award distinctions.

Search by individualÌýÌý´Ç°ùÌýÌý

State accountability reports and data tables are also available byÌýÌýand for theÌý.

The following links provide accountability ratings for all ESC regions, districts, and campuses from several different perspectives and provide additional information related to the ratings.

ÌýAll districts, campuses, and charters in Texas listed alphabetically by district

ÌýAll campuses in a district listed alphabetically

ÌýAll districts in Texas listed alphabetically and grouped by rating

ÌýAll campuses in Texas listed alphabetically and grouped by rating

ÌýAll campuses in Texas listed alphabetically and grouped by school type and rating

ÌýAll districts, campuses, and charters in Texas alphabetized by district and grouped by education service center region

ÌýAll charters in Texas listed alphabetically by district

ÌýTables that detail statewide accountability ratings and distinction designations by district, campus, charter, and school type

ÌýNarrative that summarizes the ratings statewide

ÌýAll districts, campuses, and charters in Texas ratedÌýImprovement Required orÌýAcademically UnacceptableÌýfor one or more consecutive years grouped by number of consecutive IR/AU ratings and listed numerically by district ID (from lowest to highest)

ÌýAccountability data for all districts and campuses in Texas available in Excel, comma-delimited format, or tab-delimited format
Ìý

Distinction Designations

ÌýAll districts, campuses, and charters in Texas that earned at least one distinction designation listed alphabetically by district

ÌýAll campuses in Texas that earned at least one distinction designation grouped by count of distinctions earned (from highest to lowest) and listed alphabetically by campus

ÌýAll campuses in Texas that earned every distinction designation for which they were eligible listed alphabetically by district

ÌýAll campuses in Texas that earned the Academic Achievement in English Language Art/Reading distinction designation listed alphabetically by district

ÌýAll campuses in Texas that earned the Academic Achievement in Mathematics distinction designation listed alphabetically by district

ÌýAll campuses in Texas that earned the Academic Achievement in Science distinction designation listed alphabetically by district

ÌýAll campuses in Texas that earned the Academic Achievement in Social Studies distinction designation listed alphabetically by district

ÌýAll campuses in Texas that earned the Top 25 Percent Student Progress distinction designation listed alphabetically by district

ÌýAll campuses in Texas that earned the Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps distinction designation listed alphabetically by district

Ìý(Campus)ÌýAll campuses in Texas that earned the Postsecondary Readiness distinction designation listed alphabetically by districtÌý

Ìý(District)ÌýAll districts and charter operators in Texas that earned the Postsecondary Readiness distinction designation listed alphabetically

Resources

2016 Accountability Manual describes the 2016 accountability system and explains how accountability ratings are assigned and distinction designations are awarded

Ìýand accompanyingÌýÌýOverview of the state accountability system
A Spanish version is also available:Ìý.

Overview of 2016 AccountabilityÌýPDF of PowerPoint presentation that describes the 2016 accountability system

ÌýSide-by-side comparison showing the changes in performance index indicators and targets for non-AEAs from 2015 to 2016Ìý

ÌýSide-by-side comparison showing the changes in performance index indicators and targets for AEAs from 2015 to 2016.

Overview of Performance Index Framework (one page) gives a visual overview of the performance indices for 2016.

Frequently Asked Questions Answers to questions that are commonly asked about the 2016 accountability system

2016 Small Numbers Analysis Flowcharts describe the process and methodology of small-numbers analysis, combining current-year and prior-year results to determine the performance index outcomes for small districts and campuses. Small-numbers analysis is used when the accountability results do not meet the current-year minimum-size requirements for a performance index.

Alternative Education Accountability (AEA)

2016 Final AEA Campus List contains the AECs that will be evaluated under AEA provisions in 2016. (April 29, 2016)

2016 Final AEA Charter District List contains the charter districts that will be evaluated under AEA provisions in 2016. (April 29, 2016)

Other Information

Description of when and how data are masked to protect student confidentiality and comply with the federal Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA)Ìý

2016 Performance Index Frequency DistributionsÌýThe number of districts and campuses that received each index score.

includes all materials provided to the advisory groups that met from September 2015 through January 2016 to develop recommendations for 2016 state accountability, summaries of those meetings, the final recommendations submitted to the commissioner of education, and the commissioner's final decisions regarding 2016 accountability.

Ìý